Skip to content
🌐 Global🇮🇳 India📍 Asia-Pacific📍 Bihar📍 Delhi-NCR📍 East India📍 Europe📍 Gujarat📍 Karnataka📍 Kerala📍 Madhya Pradesh📍 Maharashtra📍 Middle East📍 North India📍 Northeast India📍 Punjab📍 Rajasthan📍 South India📍 Tamil Nadu📍 Telangana📍 United Kingdom📍 United States📍 Uttar Pradesh📍 West Bengal📍 West India
LIVE
Home / Top Stories
Top Stories

'It was under Mulayam Singh's orders': UP Minister OP Rajbhar On 1990 Kar Sevaks firing - Moneycontrol.com

Uttar Pradesh minister O.P. Rajbhar claimed that the 1990 firing on Kar Sevaks was carried out under the orders of former chief minister Mulayam Singh Yadav. The statement revives a decades‑old controversy surrounding the incident.

Google News IndiaNovember 8, 20261 min read
Share this story
'It was under Mulayam Singh's orders': UP Minister OP Rajbhar On 1990 Kar Sevaks firing - Moneycontrol.com
The Strategic Consequence
Observe whether any legal petitions or parliamentary debates are initiated in response to the minister's allegation.

In a recent interview, Uttar Pradesh minister O.P. Rajbhar asserted that the tragic firing on Kar Sevaks in 1990 was executed on the instructions of then chief minister Mulayam Singh Yadav. The Kar Sevaks, a group of volunteers, had gathered to protest a land dispute when security forces opened fire, resulting in several deaths and injuries. Rajbhar's remarks bring renewed attention to a case that has remained a point of contention in the state's political history, with families of the victims seeking accountability for many years.

The incident occurred during a period of heightened communal tension in the region, and the official inquiry at the time concluded with limited findings. Over the years, various political parties have referenced the event to criticize opponents or to highlight law and order concerns. Rajbhar's claim aligns with narratives put forward by opposition leaders who have long accused the former administration of heavy‑handed tactics. However, no new evidence has been presented publicly, and legal experts note that any re‑examination would require a formal petition to the courts.

Advertisement

For readers in India, especially those in Uttar Pradesh, the statement matters because it touches on issues of historical justice, political accountability, and the legacy of past governance. Revisiting the episode could influence current political discourse, affect voter sentiment, and potentially lead to renewed legal scrutiny. Understanding the background helps citizens evaluate the credibility of such claims and the possible implications for contemporary politics in the state.

📡 Verified Wire Agency Verified Resource & Provenance
✉
The Next Brief
Get the day's most important stories in one email
AI-curated morning digest. No noise. Unsubscribe anytime.

Comments 0

Advertisement

Related stories

Most read

  1. 1'Scene' BO day 2: Suriya and Naslen's film crosses Rs 80 Cr worldwideEntertainment
  2. 2NMDC Sells 2,050 Carats of Panna Diamonds, Top Bid Reaches Rs 57 LakhBusiness
  3. 3Trump offers press secretary role to White; UFC boss to meet PresidentSports
  4. 4'Scene' BO day 1: Suriya, Naslen film opens with Rs 34.25 crEntertainment
  5. 5'Ignore, See Consequences': IndiGo Flight Returns To Bengaluru After Hijack Threat Note Found In ToiletTop Stories