Assam CM Himanta Sarma backs woman’s paternity case against ex-Uttarakhand Minister
Assam Chief Minister Himanta Sarma has publicly supported Indira Dewri's request for a fresh CBI investigation and DNA testing to confirm the paternity of her 23‑year‑old son. The case involves a former Uttarakhand minister and has drawn attention to inter‑state legal cooperation and women's rights in India.

Indira Dewri, a resident of Assam, has renewed her demand that the Central Bureau of Investigation conduct a new probe and order a DNA test to establish whether a former minister from Uttarakhand is the biological father of her 23‑year‑old son. Dewri first raised the issue several years ago, and her request was met with limited action, prompting her to seek a higher level of scrutiny. The involvement of a senior political figure from another state adds complexity, as it raises questions about jurisdiction and the willingness of law‑enforcement agencies to pursue politically sensitive cases.
The Chief Minister of Assam, Himanta Sarma, issued a statement backing Dewri's call for a fresh investigation, emphasizing that the rule of law must apply equally to all citizens regardless of their political connections. Sarma's endorsement signals that the state government is prepared to cooperate with the central agency and may put pressure on the Uttarakhand administration to facilitate any necessary legal steps. The CBI, which handles cases of national importance, will need to assess the evidence presented, obtain court orders for DNA sampling, and navigate any diplomatic sensitivities that arise from involving a former minister from a different state.
For readers across India, the case highlights several broader concerns. It underscores the importance of transparent legal processes when allegations involve public figures, reinforcing public confidence in the justice system. It also draws attention to the challenges women face when seeking accountability in personal matters that intersect with politics. Moreover, the outcome could influence how inter‑state cooperation is handled in future investigations, potentially setting a precedent for swift action in similar disputes. The public will be watching closely to see whether the CBI proceeds with the requested tests and what impact the findings may have on the political careers of those involved.
Comments 0