Skip to content
🌐 Global🇮🇳 India📍 Asia-Pacific📍 Bihar📍 Delhi-NCR📍 East India📍 Europe📍 Gujarat📍 Karnataka📍 Kerala📍 Madhya Pradesh📍 Maharashtra📍 Middle East📍 North India📍 Northeast India📍 Punjab📍 Rajasthan📍 South India📍 Tamil Nadu📍 Telangana📍 United Kingdom📍 United States📍 Uttar Pradesh📍 West Bengal📍 West India
LIVE
Home / Top Stories
Top Stories

Bengaluru man buys liquor worth Rs 2,170, objects to paying Rs 20 for carry bag bearing store's own name and logo; consumer commission calls it unfair trade practice and deficiency in service, orders Tonique to refund Rs 20 and pay Rs 5,000 compensation and Rs 3,000 litigation costs

A consumer court in Bengaluru ruled that charging customers for carry bags featuring a store's logo constitutes an unfair trade practice. The commission ordered Tonique to refund 20 rupees to a customer, pay 5,000 rupees in compensation, and pay 3,000 rupees in litigation costs.

TOI GujaratNovember 15, 20261 min read
Share this story
Bengaluru man buys liquor worth Rs 2,170, objects to paying Rs 20 for carry bag bearing store's own name and logo; consumer commission calls it unfair trade practice and deficiency in service, orders Tonique to refund Rs 20 and pay Rs 5,000 compensation and Rs 3,000 litigation costs
The Strategic Consequence
Watch for increased compliance by retail chains and potential appeals regarding logo-printed carry bag charges in consumer courts across India.

A consumer dispute redressal commission in Bengaluru ruled in favor of a shopper who objected to being charged for a branded carry bag. The customer had purchased liquor worth 2,170 rupees at the high-end retail outlet Tonique and was subsequently charged an extra fee of 20 rupees for a carry bag bearing the store's official name and logo. The customer challenged this additional payment, arguing that consumers should not be compelled to pay money for packaging that serves as advertising material for a retail brand.

The consumer commission declared the practice of charging money for store-branded carry bags to be an unfair trade practice and a clear deficiency in service. In its detailed ruling, the commission ordered Tonique to refund the 20 rupees fee charged to the customer. Additionally, the commission directed the retail store to pay 5,000 rupees in financial compensation to the complainant for the inconvenience caused, alongside an additional 3,000 rupees to cover the litigation costs incurred during the legal proceedings.

Advertisement

For consumers across India, this legal ruling reinforces essential rights against unexpected charges and forced brand advertising by commercial businesses. Retail chains frequently attempt to charge extra money for carry bags containing their brand names, but consumer commissions in India have repeatedly held that providing basic packaging without forcing shoppers to act as walking advertisements is a basic obligation of retail merchants. This decision serves as a useful reminder that consumers can successfully challenge unfair commercial practices in court.

📡 Verified Wire Agency Verified Resource & Provenance
Original Resource
✉
The Next Brief
Get the day's most important stories in one email
AI-curated morning digest. No noise. Unsubscribe anytime.

Comments 0

Advertisement

Related stories

Most read

  1. 1Microsoft 365 outage drags on as company observes ‘limited recovery’ - The HinduTop Stories
  2. 2Kerala’s Veterinary Diplomacy: KVASU’s MoU with UAE UniversityScience
  3. 3SpaceX Starship Booster Fails in Gulf, Ending Double-Catch AttemptScience
  4. 4High Court Urges Scrutiny of Economic Offences in Anticipatory Bail RequestsPolitics
  5. 5Jensen Huang Carried a Secret for More Than a Year. It Led to His Downfall. - The New York TimesTop Stories