'CA didn't interview Hazlewood, Starc': Warner’s explosive claim in sandpaper twist
Former Australian captain David Warner has claimed that Cricket Australia did not interview three senior bowlers during its 2018 investigation. He named Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Starc and Nathan Lyon as omitted players.
The controversy surrounding the 2018 ball‑tampering scandal in Cape Town resurfaced this week after former Australian captain David Warner publicly alleged that Cricket Australia (CA) failed to interview three of its leading fast bowlers during the inquiry. Warner, who was part of the Australian squad at the time, said that the investigation team did not speak with Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Starc or Nathan Lyon in the days following the incident, despite their prominent roles in the match. The claim adds a new layer to an already complex episode that saw several players receive bans and the resignation of senior officials.
Warner’s statement was made during a press conference where he expressed disappointment with the thoroughness of the original probe. He argued that omitting interviews with key bowlers left gaps in the factual record and could have influenced the outcomes of disciplinary decisions. Cricket Australia responded by stating that the investigation followed established protocols and that all relevant personnel were consulted as needed. The board has not indicated whether it will reopen the inquiry or conduct a separate review to address Warner’s concerns.
The allegation has reignited debate among cricket fans and commentators about transparency and accountability within the sport’s governing bodies. For Australian cricket, maintaining public trust is essential, especially as the team prepares for upcoming international series. The situation may prompt CA to reassess its investigative procedures and to ensure that future inquiries include comprehensive testimony from all senior players. Observers will be watching for any official response or policy change that could shape the sport’s governance in the months ahead.
Comments 0