Skip to content
🌐 Global🇮🇳 India📍 Asia-Pacific📍 Bihar📍 Delhi-NCR📍 East India📍 Europe📍 Gujarat📍 Karnataka📍 Kerala📍 Madhya Pradesh📍 Maharashtra📍 Middle East📍 North India📍 Northeast India📍 Punjab📍 Rajasthan📍 South India📍 Tamil Nadu📍 Telangana📍 United Kingdom📍 United States📍 Uttar Pradesh📍 West Bengal📍 West India
LIVE
Home / Lifestyle
Lifestyle

Delhi High Court Orders Disclaimer on Film 'Doosra' Over Ganguly Name Use

The Delhi High Court mandated that the makers of the biopic 'Doosra' attach a disclaimer stating the film lacks Sourav Ganguly's consent. The ruling sparked a broader debate on artistic freedom and the rights of public figures in Indian cinema.

LiveLawNovember 6, 20261 min read
Share this story
Delhi High Court Orders Disclaimer on Film 'Doosra' Over Ganguly Name Use
The Strategic Consequence
The ruling may prompt a wave of similar disclaimer demands, tightening the legal environment for biographical projects across India over the next year.

The concrete rupture unfolded when the Delhi High Court issued an order requiring the producers of 'Doosra' to display a clear disclaimer that the film does not have the former cricket captain Sourav Ganguly's permission to use his name. The judgment, delivered after a petition by the cricketer's legal team, obliges the film's promotional material, opening credits and any related advertising to carry the notice, thereby altering the film's marketing strategy.

Underlying tension emerged as filmmakers and free‑speech advocates argued that the decision could set a precedent limiting creative expression, especially in biographical storytelling. Legal scholars noted the clash between the right to privacy for public personalities and the public's interest in narratives about national icons. The court's stance reflected a growing sensitivity within Indian jurisprudence toward the commercial exploitation of celebrity identities without explicit consent.

Advertisement

Downstream casualties are already evident in the film's distribution plans. Several multiplex chains have postponed screenings pending revised promotional assets, while advertisers have withdrawn sponsorships fearing legal entanglements. The production house faces additional costs to redesign posters and digital content, and the controversy may dampen audience enthusiasm, potentially affecting box‑office returns across major Indian markets.

📰 Primary Source Publication Verified Resource & Provenance
Original Resource
✉
The Next Brief
Get the day's most important stories in one email
AI-curated morning digest. No noise. Unsubscribe anytime.

Comments 0

Advertisement

Related stories

Most read

  1. 1Fire Shuts Equinor’s Visund Platform in Norwegian North SeaFinance
  2. 2Tenneco Clean Air Approves ₹450-Million West India Factory For Hot End Products - SahiTop Stories
  3. 3Supreme Court Challenges Blanket Lifelong Immunity for Election CommissionersPolitics
  4. 4Karnataka SIR: Same EPIC in 2 constituencies, and other errorsTop Stories
  5. 5Kerala Tenants Await Government Decision on Mundamveli RehabilitationPolitics