Delhi Police registers two FIRs over Opposition protest

The protest, organized by opposition parties, aimed to reach the Supreme Court to highlight concerns over recent judicial appointments. Police records show that the march was not granted the required clearance from the municipal authorities, a legal requirement for large gatherings that could affect traffic and public order. When the demonstrators arrived at the designated route, police had set up barricades to prevent an unauthorized advance. According to the police report, a mini‑truck driven by participants was used to force its way through the barriers, leading to a brief clash.

Following the incident, officers registered two First Information Reports (FIRs) against several opposition leaders who were identified as being present at the scene. The FIRs allege violations of the Public Premises (Control of Entry and Exit) Act and the Indian Penal Code sections related to unlawful assembly and damage to public property. The police have stated that the legal action is intended to deter future attempts to bypass procedural requirements for public demonstrations.

The development is significant for readers in India because it touches on the balance between the right to protest and the need for law and order in the capital. Opposition parties argue that the restrictions are being used to suppress dissent, while the government maintains that rules are necessary to maintain safety and smooth functioning of the city. The case may set a precedent for how future protests are managed, especially those that target high‑profile institutions such as the Supreme Court.