'Govt Seeing Citizens As Enemies': Madras High Court Questions State Police For Denying RSS Route March Permission
The Madras High Court questioned the state police after they refused permission for an RSS procession, suggesting the government views citizens as adversaries. The court’s oral remarks highlighted concerns about the denial of a constitutional right to peaceful assembly.

The Madras High Court heard a petition filed by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) seeking permission to hold a public march along a designated route in Chennai. The state police denied the request, citing security concerns, and the petitioners argued that the refusal infringed on their right to assemble peacefully. During the hearing, the bench asked the police to explain the basis for the denial and warned that a blanket refusal could be seen as treating ordinary citizens as hostile elements. The court’s oral observation that "this government is against any procession" underscored the seriousness of the issue.
Indian law permits public processions provided organizers give reasonable notice and authorities ensure public order. Police are required to assess risks without arbitrarily curbing lawful expression. In recent years, several states have faced criticism for denying permits to political or cultural groups, often citing law and order. The RSS, a large volunteer organization with a long history in Indian politics, frequently organizes rallies that draw large crowds, making the permission process a frequent point of contention between the group and local administrations.
The court’s intervention may set a precedent for future cases involving assembly rights. Legal experts suggest that the judgment could compel police departments to adopt clearer guidelines for evaluating permit applications, reducing the scope for discretionary refusals. For citizens and political groups, the outcome signals a reminder that constitutional freedoms remain enforceable through judicial review. Observers will watch for any follow‑up orders from the bench, including possible directions to the state government to revise its permit‑granting procedures.
Comments 0