Karnataka HC upholds constitutional validity of law on ‘prohibited’ and ‘regulated’ areas around ancient monuments

The Karnataka High Court has delivered a significant ruling that supports the legal framework governing the protection of ancient monuments in the state. The bench upheld the constitutional validity of provisions that designate specific areas around protected heritage sites as prohibited or regulated zones. These restrictions, found in Sections 20A, 20B, and 20C of the relevant heritage protection laws, aim to prevent unauthorized construction, pollution, or other activities that could damage the structural integrity or visual appeal of these historical landmarks.

The court examined whether these restrictions infringe upon the fundamental rights of citizens, particularly regarding property usage and freedom of trade. It concluded that the state has a valid reason to impose these limitations to preserve national heritage. The ruling confirms that the 200-meter radius around protected monuments is a reasonable measure to ensure their safety and preservation for future generations. This decision provides legal clarity to local authorities and developers operating in these sensitive zones.

For residents and businesses in Karnataka, this judgment reinforces the strict enforcement of heritage conservation laws. It signals that any plans for construction or commercial activity within the specified radius of ancient monuments will face significant legal scrutiny. The ruling serves as a strong precedent for similar cases in other states, emphasizing that the preservation of cultural heritage can take precedence over individual property rights in designated buffer zones.