MEA calls out UN report for saying Dawood Ibrahim's D-company India-based

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has strongly objected to a recent United Nations report that asserts Dawood Ibrahim’s D-Company is based in India. Raghoo Puri, the first secretary at India’s permanent mission to the UN, responded to the findings of Ben Saul, the special rapporteur on human rights and counter-terrorism. Puri stated that the report presents member-states with a fait accompli, which he described as an unfortunate and inaccurate characterization. The Indian government has consistently maintained that D-Company is based in Pakistan, and this report contradicts that long-standing position.

The controversy centers on the credibility and methodology behind the UN report, which India views as biased or lacking in proper verification. By labeling the report as a fait accompli, Indian officials are arguing that it imposes a conclusion without sufficient evidence, thereby undermining the integrity of international discourse on terrorism. This diplomatic pushback is part of a broader effort by India to counter narratives that it may be harboring or supporting terrorist entities, a claim that has significant implications for its international standing and security policies.

For readers in India, this issue is deeply tied to national security and diplomatic relations. The characterization of D-Company’s location has been a point of contention in India-Pakistan relations for years. Any international report that challenges India’s position can have repercussions for bilateral talks, counter-terrorism cooperation, and India’s image in global forums. The MEA’s response highlights the government’s commitment to defending its territorial integrity and security narrative on the world stage, which is for maintaining trust with international partners.