Skip to content
🌐 Global🇮🇳 India📍 Asia-Pacific📍 Bihar📍 Delhi-NCR📍 East India📍 Europe📍 Gujarat📍 Karnataka📍 Kerala📍 Madhya Pradesh📍 Maharashtra📍 Middle East📍 North India📍 Northeast India📍 Punjab📍 Rajasthan📍 South India📍 Tamil Nadu📍 Telangana📍 United Kingdom📍 United States📍 Uttar Pradesh📍 West Bengal📍 West India
LIVE
Home / Top Stories
Top Stories

Sourav Ganguly vs 'Doosra': Delhi high court seeks filmmakers’ reply on personality rights plea, asks to arrange screening

The Delhi High Court has asked the makers of the film ‘Doosra’ to respond to a petition concerning Sourav Ganguly’s personality rights. The court also directed that a screening be arranged for the parties involved.

TOI DelhiOctober 23, 20261 min read
Share this story
Sourav Ganguly vs 'Doosra': Delhi high court seeks filmmakers’ reply on personality rights plea, asks to arrange screening
The Strategic Consequence
Follow the court’s final ruling to see how it shapes personality‑rights jurisprudence in India.

A legal dispute has emerged over the biographical film titled ‘Doosra’, which portrays the life of former Indian cricket captain Sourav Ganguly. A petition was filed alleging that the filmmakers used Ganguly’s name, image, and personal story without obtaining proper consent, thereby infringing on his personality rights. The case was brought before the Delhi High Court, where the petitioner argued that the unauthorized depiction could affect the former captain’s reputation and commercial interests. The court took note of these concerns and scheduled a hearing to examine the merits of the claim.

In response, the court issued an order directing the film’s producers to submit a written reply addressing each point raised in the petition. The filmmakers were also instructed to arrange a private screening of the movie for the court, the petitioner, and any other stakeholders who requested it. This step is intended to allow all parties to assess the content directly, ensuring that any alleged misuse can be evaluated with the film in view. Legal analysts noted that personality rights cases in India are still evolving, and this hearing could set a precedent for how future biographical projects are handled.

Advertisement

The outcome of this case matters to Indian readers because it touches on the balance between creative expression and the protection of an individual’s public image. If the court rules in favor of the petitioner, it could lead to stricter requirements for obtaining consent before depicting real‑life personalities in movies, affecting filmmakers, producers, and the broader entertainment industry. Conversely, a decision supporting the filmmakers might reinforce artistic freedom while still encouraging responsible storytelling. The decision will likely influence how future biopics are produced and marketed across the country.

📡 Verified Wire Agency Verified Resource & Provenance
Original Resource
✉
The Next Brief
Get the day's most important stories in one email
AI-curated morning digest. No noise. Unsubscribe anytime.

Comments 0

Advertisement

Related stories

Most read

  1. 1State Bank of India Admits Dark Web Exposure of Customer DataFinance
  2. 2Delhi's Dust: The Gap Between Air Quality Mandates and Mechanical RealityEnvironment
  3. 3BJP worker killed in Malda; clashes break out in places during Durga immersionPolitics
  4. 4eMudhra to exit overseas web security certificate business as stock takes beatingBusiness
  5. 5Any fresh impeachment motion to remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar will follow due process: Om Birla | India News - Hindustan TimesTop Stories