'Violation of natural justice': Expelled Presidency University students challenge inquiry, seek revocation of order
Two Presidency University students were expelled after an alleged campus disturbance, prompting protests over the disciplinary process. The students have now approached the Calcutta High Court, claiming the inquiry breached natural justice.
Presidency University, one of Kolkata’s premier higher‑education institutions, expelled two undergraduate students earlier this month following a campus incident that the administration described as a serious breach of conduct. The students were suspended pending an internal inquiry, and the university’s governing council later issued a formal expulsion order citing alleged involvement in vandalism and disruption of academic activities. The decision sparked protests among the student body, with many arguing that the disciplinary process was rushed and lacked transparency. Several faculty members also voiced concerns about the lack of an appeal mechanism.
The expelled students have filed a petition in the Calcutta High Court, arguing that the university’s inquiry violated the principles of natural justice by denying them a fair hearing and by relying on anonymous testimonies. Their counsel contends that the procedural safeguards normally required in disciplinary actions, such as the right to cross‑examine witnesses and to present evidence, were not observed. The petition seeks an immediate stay on the expulsion order and requests that the university reopen the inquiry with an independent panel to ensure impartiality.
The case is being closely watched by students and academic institutions across India because it raises questions about the balance between campus safety and individual rights. If the court orders a reversal of the expulsion, it could set a precedent for how universities conduct internal investigations and protect due process for students. Conversely, a ruling that upholds the university’s action may reinforce administrative authority in handling disruptive behavior. Readers should monitor the court’s decision as it may influence policy reforms in higher education governance.
Comments 0