'Delhi Police was mentally torturing not just me but my family as well': CJP’s Abhijeet Dipke
Chief Justice Party leader Abhijeet Dipke said the Delhi Police were mentally torturing him and his family. The allegation comes as tensions rise over planned protests at Jantar Mantar.
Abhijeet Dipke, a spokesperson for the Chief Justice Party, told reporters that the Delhi Police were subjecting him and his family to ongoing mental pressure. He said the police repeatedly called his relatives, monitored his movements, and used intimidation tactics that made daily life difficult. The allegations surfaced as the city prepares for a series of demonstrations scheduled at Jantar Mantar, a traditional site for public dissent. Dipke’s statement adds to a growing list of complaints from activists who claim that law enforcement is using psychological methods to curb opposition.
The claim raises questions about the legal limits of police conduct in a democratic society. Indian law permits the police to investigate threats, but it also protects citizens from harassment that does not have a legitimate basis. Courts have previously warned that undue pressure on families can violate constitutional rights to privacy and dignity. In recent months, several opposition groups have reported similar experiences, prompting human‑rights observers to call for an independent review of police practices in Delhi. The current case may prompt the judiciary to examine whether the reported behavior crosses legal boundaries.
For residents of Delhi and the wider Indian public, the issue matters because it touches on the ability to protest without fear of personal retaliation. If the police are indeed using mental pressure, it could discourage participation in lawful assemblies and weaken public confidence in law‑enforcement agencies. The government has pledged to uphold democratic freedoms, and any breach could lead to political backlash or demands for reform. Observers will watch for any official response from the police department and for possible filings of complaints in the courts.
Comments 0